Friday

吹東風


5月3日是世界新聞自由日。大風吹,吹什麽?吹東風!

Malaysiakini.com
Chinese daily spikes critical column
Beh Lih Yi
Nov 10, 04 12:26pm

Chinese-language daily Oriental Daily News has axed a column that has been critical of government policies, after a contribution published last Saturday focused on current controls over the print media.

The daily column, which translates as ‘East Wind Blows’, has to date featured the contributions of several journalists working for the newspaper. Among issues covered were the problems faced by the Works Ministry, as well as media-related issues.

The last article - based on the restrictive Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984 (PPPA) - apparently caused a nervous reaction in the newsroom and led to the column being terminated, said sources.

It criticised administrative and political intervention in approval of the annual licence that all publishers and owners of printing presses are required to obtain to carry on operating.

Under the PPPA, the power to grant, renew and revoke permit lies with the Internal Security Ministry.

Media controls

The final column, entitled ‘Strengthen civil society, counter hegemony’, criticised the administration for still controlling the media tightly, in spite of claiming to have entered a new era.

It cited, as an example, the application by online daily malaysiakini for a print licence - which has yet to be approved after more than two years - to argue that the administration “was still leading in weakening the ‘counter hegemony’ forces”.

The writer, it is learnt, was asked by editors to explain the reference to malaysiakini’s application status, because he had written that the application “was not approved”.

In June, the Internal Security Ministry strongly hinted in a parliamentary reply that it would not approve the application, but also said the matter was still under consideration.

The minister, Abdullah Ahmad Badawi - also the prime minister - expressed the fear that a print version of malaysiakini would be “prejudicial and jeopardise national security and public order”.

No instruction

Asked to comment, two senior editors of Oriental Daily News denied that the decision to remove the column was prompted by instructions from the Internal Security Ministry. Both refused to be named.

“It was merely an internal adjustment, we want to revamp the contents,” one editor said.

He said the adjustment would involve other changes to editorial content, but did not elaborate or say what would replace the column that has been removed.

The other editor hinted that the column could be continued, but with a different name.

Meanwhile, editor-in-chief Puah You Lai said in his column last Saturday that the editorial team has come under pressure from readers recently for refusing to publish articles by columnists Phoon Wing Keong and Josh Hong.

Puah explained that the newspaper was obliged to take into consideration various requirements including “social responsibility, legal issues and external pressures”.

Phoon told a forum recently that his articles were not published after he criticised the MCA’s role in Barisan Nasional and the MCA’s latest campaign, the lifelong learning programme.

Timber tycoon

Oriental Daily News, owned by Sarawakian timber tycoon Lau Hui Kang’s KTS group was launched on Sept 29, 2002, but its operations were suspended the same evening.

It hit the streets again on Jan 1, 2003 after nearly three months of negotiations with the government.

The paper has alleged there were initial attempts to block its circulation by four other major Chinese dailies in the market. Its opinion page was removed early last year, but it resumed shortly after.

Among the journalists and columnists who are contriubuting to the newspaper are those who have supported a boycott of other Chinese dailies, following MCA’s controversial acquisition of Nanyang Press Holdings in May 2001.

2 Comments:

Blogger ooiheng said...

2004年11月6日下午5時許,甫抵達陌生的哥市即接到通知,專欄文字經出事。

強勢民間 制衡力量

一般而言,年尾一到,馬來西亞各語文報章都活在深層的壓抑下。只有在順利「申請」到來年的出版准証后,這層壓抑才得以舒緩下來。

《印刷與出版法令》于1987年修訂后,所謂的「更新」(renewal)准証,不只是國會民主制底下的行政手續那麼簡單,反之,它是反法治精神的硬性規定——必須「重新申請」,且不能通過法律途徑挑戰的「行政決定」!

雖然該法令是殖民時代的產物,但其所涵蓋的許多「惡質條文」,都是一貫的作法,尤其是1987年的修訂,是一次違反法治精神的徹底修訂。

我國獨立前夕,報章的報導貼緊社會脈搏,有助於孕育民族與國家之間的共生關係。當時,報章發揮民族主義的特色,抵禦英殖民地政府的帝國主義思想。

獨立後,報章積極參與推動建國的思想,那是新生公民由下而上的「政治介入」行為,也有學者稱此為「意識形態的介入」,體現出集體政治生命積極的一面。

1961年第一波報變發生後,報章與社會的共生關係急速滑落,國家直接介入媒體的運作,媒體逐漸成為國家機器的一部分。這一次由上而下的政治介入,是行政權力試圖通過國家機關,實行對主流媒體的掌控,也有學者稱此為領導權(hegemony)的行使。

回到該法令于1987年的修訂,理大大眾傳播系副教授慕斯達法(Mustafa K. Anuar)在多篇學術論文中指出,當時是國民醒覺運動(ALIRAN)因為其《激流》月刊自1982年開始申請國語版出版准証不果后,決定把政府控上法庭並勝訴。

隨後政府修訂該法令,允許「行政決定」超越「司法決定」,並通過上訴庭否決國語版《激流》的出版。

筆者以為,這也是行政權力行使領導權的手段。不同的是,第一波報變是行政權力形塑「執政領導權」(ruling hegemony)的做法,否決國語版《激流》月刊的出版,則是行政權力試圖削弱民間形塑「制衡領導權」(counter-hegemony)的做法。

來到新世紀,上個世紀的「惡質制度」,仍舊牢牢調控著「國家與媒體」的詮釋關係。《當今大馬》(www.malaysiakini.com)申請印刷准証不被批准,以及這一年的種種跡象顯示,行政權力居於內部政治問題,或許不能更好的鞏固其執政領導權,但在削弱「制衡領導權」方面,卻還是一枝獨秀!

隨後東風停吹、青年夭折,更有時評人陪葬。5天后,《當今大馬》刊出這則新聞。

4/5/07  
Blogger ooiheng said...

這是《東風吹》專欄。

4/5/07  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home